Systems and methods to perform defect management to block addressable storage media

ABSTRACT

The present invention discloses a method and system for providing defect management of a bulk data storage media wherein logical addresses of media data blocks are continuously slipped to omit all media data blocks determined to be defective at the time of an initial media format. Thereafter, selectable parameters are utilized to define a logical zone including both a user data area and corresponding replacement data area on the media such that proper selection of the parameters provides defect management optimized for a particular use of the media.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/089,112 filed on Jun.2, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,212,647.

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the storage of information on a bulkstorage media and, more particularly, to a system and method forproviding media defect management with non-iterative deterministicconversion of logical address information to physical addressinformation.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Bulk storage media, such as magnetic and optical storage media, ofteninclude defects, such as inconsistencies in a magnetic or opticalcoating or other surface anomalies, which make portions of the mediaunsuitable for data storage. However, it is often desirable to use mediacontaining such defects, as these defective areas are generallyrelatively small compared to the total storage area of the media.Moreover, such defects may develop or be detected during normal use ofthe storage media. Therefore, schemes for identifying and avoiding thesedefective areas have been used.

Traditional schemes for defect management have been complex andinflexible. These schemes have relied on utilizing a portion of themedia as a defect management area in order to present a media that,although including defective areas, appears as if it were defect free.Accordingly, upon a manufacturer's formatting of the media forsubsequent use in data storage, an analysis of the storage areas is madeand defective areas are marked as unusable. In order to provide mediawhich includes a particular amount of available user storage area,logical addresses of the user data areas are “slipped” into the defectmanagement area so as to omit the physical address of these defectiveareas and, thus, present defect free logical media.

However, as defects may develop or be discovered during actual use ofthe bulk storage media, there must also be a method of providingredirection for or replacement of defective areas discovered during useto available sparing areas. Accordingly, the systems operate to remap orredirect the logical address associated with an area determineddefective to the logical address of a sparing area. Therefore, themanufacturer's initial formatting of the media includes establishingpredefined user data areas and corresponding predefined sparing areas(defect redirection or remapping areas).

For example, with magneto-optical (MO) discs, the MO drive has torecognize the particular media and, thus, use predetermined data areas(user data areas) and predetermined sparing areas (defect redirection orremapping areas). Such sparing areas may be interspersed with the userdata areas throughout the media at various intervals, thus establishingzones within the media wherein an amount of user data area and itscorresponding sparing area are established. Therefore, defect managementtables are provided to allow the drive to properly read and write userdata within these zones without encountering a defective area. However,it should be appreciated that these prior art defect management tablesstore only a list of used sparing areas and, thus, require complexoperations in order to determine sparing areas available for remapping.

On most media, regardless of the physical position of the tracks definedfor data storage, the information density of these tracks remainsconstant. However, as tracks are established further out toward acircumferential edge of a media disc, the tracks themselves becomelarger. Therefore, there are more sectors per track available on tracksdisposed radially toward the circumferential edge as compared to tracksdisposed more radially inward. However, prior art systems tend to keepthe zones a fixed radial width, i.e., each zone includes substantiallythe same number of tracks, which means that zones disposed further outtoward the circumferential edge include more sectors than the onesfurther in because of the longer tracks included in the zones furtherout in diameter on the media surface.

For example, as the tracks become longer due to their concentricdisposition on the media, a track eventually becomes large enough toallow an additional sector to be fit in (the generally adopted dataformats of bulk storage media do not provide for partial sectors).Therefore, as the tracks become longer as they are established furtherout toward the circumferential edge, tracks are defined having increasedspace not quite sufficient to provide an additional sector. However,provided enough tracks are defined on the media, a track is establishedhaving sufficient length to provide a complete extra sector. This is anatural division point on the media for any kind of operation, such asthe above described zone boundaries. Therefore, zones defined by thisphenomena of the media, although having a constant information density,will provide differing amounts of data storage.

The prior art systems generally set aside more blocks for defectmanagement (sparing blocks comprised of sparing sectors) within thezones disposed more toward the circumferential edge, such that asubstantially constant ratio of defect management blocks to user datablocks are set aside for sparing. Thus, the intervals at which thesparing areas are spaced do not present a simple mathematicalrelationship and, accordingly, are not easily accessed without a defectmanagement table including sufficient information to provide logicaladdressing for the irregular sparing intervals.

Furthermore, as the zones associated with the user data areas and thesparing areas are defined by the physical attributes of the media, thesparing portion of a zone may not always present a desired amount ofsparing blocks nor a desired distribution upon the media. A prior artzone will include a particular number of total sectors due to itsrelationship to the physical attributes of the media. Accordingly, usingan example of 1100 total sectors in a particular zone, if it is desiredto provide 1000 sectors as free user data storage and 100 sectors ofsparing, this may not be possible. If there are defective sectors withinthe 1000 sectors upon the manufacturer's formatting of the media, thisdeficiency in the user data storage space will be compensated for byslipping these defective sectors to the sparing sector. Thus, thesparing sectors will initially be short sectors from the desired total.Accordingly, there will not be the desired amount of sparing areaavailable for sparing during actual use of the media.

Moreover, it should be appreciated that slipping of the defectivestorage areas into the sparing area is done in the prior art for eachzone, i.e., user storage area and corresponding sparing areacombination. Accordingly, the slipping mismatch resets itself at everyzone. As slipping starts from the beginning of the zone, an actualimplementation must determine for any operation, i.e., for a randomsector read or write request, the system must determine how many sectorsare listed in the defect list prior to that one but in that zone.Therefore the system must know the physical start address of the zone,and how many defects are listed between that address and the requestedsector. Determining this information involves at least two lookups inthe defect table.

Additionally, with prior art systems relying on physical phenomena inorder to define zones, and therefore define sparing sector intervals,sparing is tied to the physical attributes of the media. However, aparticular sparing scheme defined by the media's physical attributes maynot be optimized for the particular environment in which the storagemedia is going to be used. For example, use of the media in environmentswhich require streamed data, such as recording video or audio, may notbenefit optimally from sparing intervals established as a function ofthe physical phenomena of the media.

Furthermore, the amount of space set aside for defect management cannotbe changed in these prior art schemes, as the defect managementtechniques have written into the media standard itself the location forthe sectors that are used for defect management. For example, a massstorage unit incorporating prior art defect management techniques willgenerally come from the manufacturer with certain areas set aside fordefect management and the allocation of these areas could not bealtered.

Therefore, a need exists in the art for a system and method for managingdefects on bulk storage media which is simplified in its implementation.

A further need exists in the art for a defect management technique whichis independent of physical characteristics of the bulk media.

A still further need in the art exists for the defect managementtechnique to be configurable for the particular environment in which itis to be used.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

These and other objects, features and technical advantages are achievedby a system and method which provides defect management by slippingdefects known at format across the entire media and redirecting areasdetermined to be defective thereafter to sparing areas which areestablished according to selectable parameters. Accordingly, simplemathematical relationships may be utilized in determining the physicaladdress of any desired logical address. Moreover, due to consistentapplication of the defect management technique across the media, defectmanagement tables only need be referenced a single time in the physicaladdress determination.

According to the present invention, two defect management lists ortables are maintained, although multiple copies of each will betypically stored. The first table, the primary defect list, includesdefects known at format time. Items in this table are simply dropped outof the logical space of the drive for read and write operations. This ispreferably done only at format time, as changing this table potentiallyaffects the logical address of every sector on the media.

Although initially appearing similar to traditional implementations, theprimary defect list of the present invention is improved in that onlyone search of the table, i.e., a very fast binary search, is required indetermining a physical address from a logical address because of theuniform slipping of defective areas. Accordingly, to determine aphysical address, all that is required is searching the primary defectlist for the last entry having an address less than the current area ofinterest and adding the number of slipped addresses associated therewithto the logical address of the area of interest to determine its physicaladdress.

Preferably, entries in the primary defect list are tagged as to theirorigin, such as manufacture, user certification, or user specified, andare sorted by location. Blocks are skipped by the index into the tablewhere the entry is larger than the requested block, and that index isadded to the requested block.

The second table, or secondary defect list, includes defects foundduring use. Defective blocks are marked as such, and space set aside atformat time for sparing is used instead. This list provides the map ofdefective areas to their new, spared, location. However, it shall beappreciated that slipping as described above with respect to the primarydefect list not only prevents primary defects from being slipped intothe spare areas, but also allows for the spares areas themselves to beslipped. Specifically, if one of the areas that would have beenallocated as a spare is defective, the spare area effectively grows suchthat there is the total amount of space available for sparing withineach flexible zone. Accordingly, slipping across the entire media notonly provides the improved initial search described above with respectto the primary defect list, but also allows for realization of an amountof sparing area desired without this area being reduced by manufacturerdefects.

Preferably the secondary defect list contains all space available forsparing, whether or not it has been used for sparing, as this reducesthe algorithm necessary for finding available sparing space to merelysearching a list. Accordingly, the supplementary defect list of thepreferred embodiment of the present invention never changes in sizeduring running. Such a list is initially larger, i.e., includes moresparing entries, than in previous algorithms, where a table is appendedeach time a remapping of a defective area to a sparing area occurs.However, it should be appreciated that this list is constant in size.Moreover, although the secondary defect list of this preferredembodiment of the present invention initially contains more entries, noadditional data storage space is required as the prior art systems mustnecessarily include sufficient storage space reserved for full entry ofall defect mapping available. As such, the present invention greatlysimplifies runtime algorithms, such as for determining space availablefor sparing, without effectively requiring any additional memoryresources.

In a preferred embodiment, the secondary defect list is sorted, allowingvery fast searches. For example, using a sorted list requires only asingle search for either finding a replaced sector or verifying that asector has not been replaced. Likewise, a single search is required tofind a space for replacement. Accordingly, when a defect on the media isfound during use, the system need only look to the next available, ornearest available, entry in the secondary defect list and move theinformation to that location.

In contrast, previous algorithms required generating an allocation mapfor available space and subtracting what had been used according to thelist. Accordingly, these traditional schemes have required additionalmemory or time in order to determine sparing space available forremapping of a defective areas. For example, old systems can generallydetermine what was set aside for sparing and what has been used and,therefore, can build a map in memory of what is available for use whenremapping is necessary. However, this scheme is more complex than thatof the present invention and actually occupies more memory and/or takesmore time. Specifically, it is either necessary to have this freesparing area table generated up front, in addition to the secondarydefect list providing the remapping of particular defective areas, toprovide information with respect to available sparing areas when needed,or it must be generated each time remapping is called for, i.e., on thefly, which takes time and can degrade system performance.

Additionally, the prior art defect management schemes allow chainingi.e., if block A is defective and remapped to B, if B is later found tobe defective, B will be further remapped to C. Therefore, prior artalgorithms in accessing block A have to look to a table to determine Ahas been remapped from A to B. Then the prior art algorithms must checkthe table again to make sure that B was not in turn remapped, such as toC. This presents the possibility of a very long chain search.

However, a preferred embodiment of the present invention providesentries in the secondary defect list to indicate a subsequent remapping.Accordingly, if block B, providing remapping for block A to block B, issubsequently determined to be defective, the entry from A to B is markedas no longer valid. Thereafter, another entry is generated and A is nowmapped directly to C. This scheme penalizes the write sequence slightlyin that it is necessary to first mark the block defective and thendirectly remap A to C. However, this slight increase in overheadassociated with a write operation for a remapped block determined to bedefective is more than compensated for in the decreased overhead for theremapped block in all subsequent accesses.

Space for sparing is set aside in the format specification in prior artdefect management schemes, i.e., the space for logical sectors will fallnaturally and is used to define the space for defect management and/oris specified by the media standard. Accordingly, this information cannotbe changed after design time. However, the present invention does notdefine special areas for sparing. Instead, two parameters that describethe spare areas are utilized: the spare interval (SI) and the sparelength (SL).

According to the present invention, there are SL spare blocks per SIuser data blocks. This allows the defect management to be distributed(small SI and SL), blocked (large SI and SL), etcetera. Accordingly, thepresent invention provides for flexible or logical zones as defined bythe selectable parameters SI and SL.

Different applications or environments have different needs with respectto defect management. For example, defect management may optimally beconfigured for streaming storage as opposed to reliable storage or datarate on good media as opposed to data rate on poor quality media. Inoperation of the present invention, allocation of spare areas can beadjusted to accommodate these different needs at format time byselecting the parameters SI and SL accordingly.

Below are shown examples of particular attributes for selection of theparameters SI and SL to provide defect management useful in variousenvironments:

Choosing SI and SL such that SI+SL˜(media size) results in aconfiguration where all spare space is set aside at an end of the media;

Choosing SI and SL such that 2*SI+SL˜(media size) results in aconfiguration where all spare space is set aside at approximately themiddle of the media;

Choosing SI and SL such that 2*(SI+SL)˜(media size) results in aconfiguration where two spare areas are set aside, one each atapproximately the middle of the media and the other at an end of themedia; and

Choosing SI and SL such that (media size)/(SI+SL) is large results adistributed sparing configuration that provides for streamingperformance at a rate of SI/(SI+SL) of the non-spared rate, but has nosubstantial “gaps” in the user data areas SI. In contrast, the second ofthe above examples has such a gap since, when the end of the first userdata area SI is reached, the drive must seek to SI+SL, skipping the SLarea, to access the second user data area SI.

According to the present invention, applying a replacement space formulafollowed by a slipping space formula provides non-iterative,deterministic conversion of a logical block address (the error-freespace) to a physical address (which contains spare areas, defects, andreplacements). Moreover, just by changing the parameters, the presentscheme can either behave in a manner similar to a more traditionalscheme, where large chunks of data are followed by large chunks of dataset aside for sparing, or a model that is distributed where, althoughproviding the same relative percentage of sectors available, a shortstretch of user data is followed by space assigned for sparing, forexample.

Selection of the parameters to define the flexible zones of the presentinvention may be at any point up to user format time. Accordingly, auser may choose values for SI and SL which provide defect managementoptimized for the particular environment into which the media is to bedeployed. Alternatively, a user may indicate an amount of space to setaside for sparing and indicate a particular sparing scheme, such asdistributed or blocked, or indicate an environment or use of the mediaand allow an algorithm to select the parameters SI and SL optimized forthe use.

It should be appreciated that there is no requirement that n*(SI+SL)exactly match the media size and, therefore, the present inventionsupports such cases without requiring special handling.

Likewise, it should be appreciated that the present invention results ina simplified technique for defect management through the use of defectlists provided to allow conversion of logical addresses to physicaladdresses rapidly, such as through entries established for all spareaddresses as well as their attendant categorization and sorting andsimple mathematical relationships between these addresses provided byslipping the entire media and the use of configurable parameters todefine user and sparing storage areas. However, it should also beappreciated that in the preferred embodiment of the present invention,as many factors may be traded off between reading and writing, it ispreferred to make it easier to read than to write in order to maintaincompatibility with read only drives, such as DVD or CD ROM mediaformats. Accordingly, requiring that the tables be sorted as discussedabove, although increasing overhead during a write operation when asector is remapped, is preferably performed in order to make subsequentreads easier.

The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technicaladvantages of the present invention in order that the detaileddescription of the invention that follows may be better understood.Additional features and advantages of the invention will be describedhereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. Itshould be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conceptionand the specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basisfor modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the samepurposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by thoseskilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart fromthe spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appendedclaims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and theadvantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptionstaken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates defect management according to the prior art;

FIG. 2 illustrates defect management according to an embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a system adapted to provide defect managementaccording to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates replacing of defective user blocks with sparingblocks; and

FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of the sequence of determining aphysical address from a logical address according to an embodiment ofthe present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In understanding the present invention it is helpful to reviewtraditional schemes for providing defect management. Accordingly, withreference to FIG. 1, defect management according to the prior art willbe briefly discussed. Shown in FIG. 1 is bulk media 100 having tracks 1through 6 defined thereon. It shall be appreciated that the tracks ofmedia 100 are progressively increased in length. This is due to themedia of this example is representative of a disc surface where thetracks are concentric rings which, as they are disposed more near thecircumferential edge of the disc, are larger.

The tracks of media 100 have sectors defined therein, i.e., sectors 111a-113 b for track 1, sectors 121 a-123 b for track 2, sectors 131 a-134b for track 3, sectors 141 a-144 b for track 4, sectors 151 a-155 b fortrack 5, and sectors 161 a-165 b for track 6.

It shall be appreciated that in progressing from track 1 to track 6,there are areas within ones of the tracks, here tracks 2, 4, and 6,where there is insufficient space in which to define a complete sector.These areas are shown as areas 172, 174, and 176, respectively. As thesystem utilizes the media in units of sectors, the areas which areinsufficient for defining a complete sector remain unused forinformation storage, although presenting natural boundaries for definingzones. Accordingly, shown in FIG. 1 are zone 1, including tracks 1 and2, zone 2, including tracks 3 and 4, and zone 3, including tracks 5 and6, which are defined by the points at which a track includes sufficientadditional space to provide a complete additional sector over that of anext track.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, certain of the sectors are defective.Accordingly, when determined to be defective upon manufacturers format,primary or low level format, sectors 112 b, 132 a, and 142 b are omittedfrom the available logical addresses and are, thus, slipped tonon-defective sectors.

Media 100 is addressable in sectors but is recorded in units of blockswhich include multiple ones of the addressable sectors (here 2 sectorsper block). Accordingly, the zones of this prior art system are brokendown into blocks consisting of multiple sectors, such as during a userformat, secondary or high level format. Specifically, zone 1 includesblocks 111-113 (track 1) and blocks 121 and 122 (track 2), zone 2includes blocks 131-134 (track 3) and blocks 141-143 (track 4), and zone3 includes blocks 151-155 (track 5) and blocks 161-165 (track 6). Theblocks of media 100 are shown in FIG. 1 as having two sectors per blockfor simplicity. Block 112 is defined to cover an area of the medialarger than two sectors, although only including two usable sectors, asthe primary format has omitted the defective sector from the logicaladdresses available for use and the secondary format utilizes thisinformation in defining the blocks.

It shall be appreciated that, relying on the natural phenomena of themedia to define zone boundaries, the blocks of zone 1 are unable toutilize sector 123 b as there is insufficient space within zone 1 asdefined by the phenomena of the media to provide a complete block.

Relying on the natural phenomena of the zone boundaries necessarilylimits the total number of sectors, and therefore blocks, available foruse in a zone. This may become problematic when slipping logical blockaddresses for a primary defect list.

The prior art systems provide for defect management by allotting anumber of the sectors within a zone for user data and any unusedremaining sectors for sparing. For example, zone 2 of FIG. 1 may havethe first twelve sectors allotted for user data area and, thus, theexpected remaining four sectors for sparing. However, zone 2 is shownhaving defective sectors 132 a and 142 b. If these defects are detectedduring a primary format of the media, the physical address for these twosectors would be omitted in the logical address table for the media.Accordingly, although sector 132 a is the third physical sector of zone2, sector 132 b would be logically identified as the third sector (thelogical address is slipped one address space to omit the defectivesector). Likewise, although sector 142 b is the twelfth physical sectorof zone 2, sector 143 a would be logically identified as the eleventhsector (the logical address is slipped two address spaces to omit thetwo proceeding defective sectors). As the total number of sectors andblocks is defined by the physical phenomena of the zone, this slippingwill cause sectors 143 a and 143 b to be utilized for user storage areasin order to provide the desired number of user blocks. Accordingly, theuser sectors are slipped into the area of zone 2 which might otherwisebe available for sparing. Therefore, after secondary formatting, thedesired six user storage blocks are available although only a singlesparing block is provided. Moreover, if there are so may defects foundthat slipping past the end of the spare area would occur, replacement isused instead, with the replacement sectors allocated from the spare areaof another zone.

Additionally, as the zones of the media of FIG. 1 are determined by thephysical phenomena, the physical address of the first block of zone 2will be unaffected by the slipping due to defects in zone 1.Accordingly, the slipping of logical addresses will begin afresh foreach zone. For example, defective sector 132 a, the third physicalsector of zone 2, will cause sector 132 b to be logically addressed asthe third sector of this zone irrespective of the slipping of sectors inzone 1 due to defective sector 112 b. This requires a determination ofthe starting logical address of zone 2 and then a determination of thenumber of sectors slipped within that zone physically addressed prior toa block of interest before a determination can be made as to the logicaladdress of a sector of interest.

Directing attention to FIG. 2, media 200, initially the same as media100 of FIG. 1, utilizing defect management according to the presentinvention is illustrated. Shown in FIG. 2 are tracks of increasinglengths, as in FIG. 1, having defined therein sectors, i.e., sectors 211a-213 b for track 1, sectors 221 a-223 b for track 2, sectors 231 a-234b for track 3, sectors 241 a-244 b for track 4, sectors 251 a-255 b fortrack 5, and sectors 261 a-265 b for track 6.

Sectors identified as defective during primary formatting are omittedfrom the logical address space of media 200 in order to avoid their use.Accordingly, the logical addresses are slipped to correspond to aphysical address of a subsequent non-defective sector. However, theslipping of the logical address is preferably the same unit as theblocks to be utilized in order to simplify the algorithms used todetermine physical addresses of blocks.

Information with respect to defective sectors determined at this time offormat is preferably stored in a first list, such as a primary defectlist (PDL). Preferably, entries in the primary defect list are tagged asto their origin, such as manufacture, user certification, or userspecified, and are sorted by location.

It shall be appreciated that, according to the present invention, thewhole medium is slipped, not just individual zones between allocateddefect management areas. Accordingly, only one search of the PDL tableis required to determine the physical address of a particular logicaladdress.

As with the media of FIG. 1, in progressing from track 1 to track 6 onmedia 200, there are areas within ones of the tracks, here tracks 2, 4,and 6, where there is insufficient space in which to define a completesector. These areas are shown as areas 272, 274, and 276, respectively.However, unlike the media of FIG. 1, the present invention does not relyon natural phenomena corresponding to these increases in track lengthsin order to identify zones or otherwise define user and correspondingsparing areas.

Media 200 is further broken down into blocks consisting of multiplesectors, such as during a user format, secondary or high level format.Specifically, media 200 includes blocks 211-212 (track 1), blocks221-223 (track 2), blocks 231-233 (track 3), blocks 241-243 (track 4),blocks 251-255 (track 5), and blocks 261-265 (track 6). However, asdescribed above, the present invention preferably utilizes the same unitof slipping as of replacement. Accordingly, block 232 begins at sector233 a due to defective sector 232 a, for example. Utilizing the sameunit of slipping as of replacement both simplifies reading as well assimplifies writing when compared to prior art systems which allowsslipping at the sector level and, therefore, the physical length of aparticular block is indeterminate. Although discussed with reference toa primary and secondary format to more clearly describe the conceptsinvolved, it shall be appreciated that the mapping of physical addressesto logical addresses as well as establishing the blocks of sectors maybe accomplished in a single format process.

It shall be appreciated that the blocks of media 200 are not dividedinto physical zones as were those of media 100. Accordingly, a block ofmedia 200 may span an area between two tracks even where the two tracksinvolve the additional sector phenomena defining a zone in the priorart.

It shall be appreciated that although blocks having only two sectorstherein are shown for simplicity in illustrating the concepts discussedherein, the present invention is not so limited. For example, apreferred embodiment of the present invention is used with mediaaddressable in 2K sectors which are recorded in units (blocks) of 32K(16 sectors per block). Furthermore, although discussed with referenceto block addressable media, the present invention is equally adaptableto other media. For example, the concepts of the present invention areuseful for providing defect management for media which is not blocked,i.e., where a block is defined as a single sector, as well as variableblocked media. Accordingly, the present invention may be adjusted toaccommodate blocked, non-blocked, or variable block technology, i.e.,technology which allows the block size to be defined at format time, butwhich is constant within a given medium.

As discussed above, the present invention does not rely on predefinedzones to provide user areas and areas for sparing. Instead, parametersthat describe logical zones are utilized and the existence of physicalzones or tracks are ignored, making the assumption that there is acontiguous set of physical sectors, possibly grouped into blocks,available. This assumption holds even on media having zones, as the lastsector of zone 3 has an address one smaller than the first sector inzone 4, for example. Therefore, the present invention defines equalsized logical zones from the sectors/blocks of the media. Accordingly,different applications having different needs, such as streaming orreliable storage, data rate on good media or data rate on poor qualitymedia, etcetera, may be optimally accommodated by defect managementaccording to the present invention. Allocation of spare areas can beallocated to accommodate these needs at format time when this inventionis used.

Logical zones are described by two parameters, the spare interval (SI)and the spare length (SL), according to a preferred embodiment of thepresent invention. These parameters define a relationship for the mediasuch that there are SL spare blocks per SI user data blocks and,therefore, a logical zone is the unit SI+SL. This allows the defectmanagement to be distributed (small SI and SL) or blocked (large SI andSL).

The equal size logical zones of the present invention allow a straightforward formula to be used to determine zone addresses rather than morecumbersome lookup tables. Additionally, the use of logical zones allowsthe slipping to occur across the whole disc, including within the sparearea. This further simplifies the implementation as well as provides aconsistent size available for later replacement.

Furthermore, the use of a logical zone rather than following theunderlying physical structure allows the same media to support a varietyof applications. For example, a disc with 16 sectors of spare areafollowed by 256 sectors of user data provides a media with 6% availablefor sparing, and a continuous performance of 94% of the underlying mediarate. The same disc, formatted with 65536 sectors of spare area and1048576 sectors of user data still provides for 6% available sectors forsparing, but instead delivers 100% performance except for a delayapproximately every million sectors.

Referring still to FIG. 2, illustrative examples of selection of SI andSL are provided below to demonstrate provision of defect managementadapted for various uses. It shall be appreciated that media 200 of FIG.2 provides 45 sectors after primary formatting (slipping logicaladdresses to omit defective sectors). These 45 sectors provide 21 blocksfor use after secondary formatting (defining blocks from the availablesectors). However, unlike the prior art system relying on the physicalattributes of the media to define zones of user and correspondingsparing areas, the blocks of the present invention are available for useaccording to the needs of the particular environment into which media200 is to be deployed.

Choosing SI=17 and SL=4 for media 200, or SI+SL˜media size, all sparespace is set aside at an end of media 200. Specifically, as the spareinterval (SI) is seventeen blocks in length, the spare blocks fall at anend of media 200. Accordingly, blocks 211-212, 221-223, 231-233,241-243, 251-255 and 261 may present a user area of seventeen blockswhile blocks 262-265 provide sparing.

Choosing SI=8 and SL=4 for media 200, or 2*SI+SL˜media size, all sparespace is set aside at the middle of the media. Specifically, as thespare interval (SI) is eight blocks in length, the spare blocks fallbetween two spare intervals of eight blocks each and, thus, is disposedin the middle of media 200. Accordingly, blocks 211-213, 221-223 and231-234 may present a first user area of eight blocks, blocks 241-243and 251 present a sparing area of four blocks, and blocks 252-255, and261-264 present a second user area of eight blocks.

Choosing SI=7 and SL=3 for media 200, or 2*(SI+SL)˜media size, two spareareas are set aside, one each at the middle and an end of the media.Specifically, as the spare intervals are seven blocks in length, thereare sufficient blocks to present two user areas with a spare intervalthere between with an additional spare interval at an end of the media.Accordingly, blocks 211-212, 221-223, 231 and 232 may present a firstuser area of seven blocks, blocks 233, 241, and 242 present a firstsparing area of three blocks, blocks 243, 251-255, and 261 present asecond user area of seven blocks, and blocks 262, 263, and 264 present asecond sparing area of three blocks.

Choosing SI=2 and SL=1 for media 200, or (media size)/(SI+SL) to belarge; results in distributed sparing that provides for streamingperformance at a rate of SI/(SI+SL) of the non-spared rate, but has no“gaps.” Accordingly, blocks 211 and 212 may present a first user area,block 221 present a first sparing area, blocks 222 and 223 present asecond user area, block 231 present a second sparing area, etcetera.

In use, second list, the replacement list or secondary defect list(SDL), stores information with respect to defects found during use.Accordingly, defective blocks are marked as such, and the space setaside for sparing is used for replacement blocks. This list provides themap of defective areas to their new, spared, location.

According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the SDLcontains all space available for sparing, whether or not it has beenused for sparing. This reduces the algorithm for finding availablesparing space to searching a list. Although the SDL of the presentinvention may be initially larger than in previous algorithms, it isconstant in size. Moreover, only a single search is needed for eitherfinding a replaced sector or verifying that a sector has not beenreplaced. Additionally, the replacement list is preferably sorted, thusallowing very fast searches.

It shall be appreciated that the concepts of the present invention asdescribed above may be implemented on any number of processor basedsystems and their associated bulk storage media. Directing attention toFIG. 3, a preferred embodiment of a system, system 300, adaptedaccording to the present invention is shown. Here system 300 includesprocessor based system 310 having input device 311, i.e., a keyboard,and output device 312, i.e., a video display. System 300 also includesbulk media drive unit 350 having media 200 disposed therein. Drive unit350 includes head assembly 351 adapted to exchange information betweenmedia 200 and processor based system 310.

Of course, a processor based system adapted according to the presentinvention may assume forms other than that shown in FIG. 3. For example,drive unit 350 may include a processor in addition to, or in lieu of,the processor of processor based system 310.

Shown in block diagramatic form are the above described data areas ofmedia 200. Specifically, media 200 includes primary defect list 321,secondary defect list 322, sparing area 323, and user data area 324. Ofcourse, the data areas illustrated are not intended to represent theactual placement, relative size, or inter-relationship of these dataareas.

Utilizing the above described PDL and SDL with the knowledge of theareas set aside for defect management from the information SI and SL,applying a replacement space formula, followed by a slipping spaceformula, allows non-iterative, deterministic conversion of a logicaladdress (the error-free space) to a physical address (which containsspare areas, defects, and replacements). In order to provide furtherdetail with respect to these concepts, use of logical zones and theprimary defect and secondary defect lists of the present invention toprovide defect management for sector slipped across the media accordingto the present invention will be discussed in detail below withreference to a preferred specific embodiment.

Implementation of the above inventive concepts will be described hereinbelow with respect to a preferred embodiment media adapted to provideinformation capabilities according to an accepted standard, such asdigital video disc (DVD). The preferred embodiment provides both readand write capability, referred to hereinafter as DVD+RW, as opposed toread only, such as DVD-ROM.

Preferably, DVD+RW media is divided into 3 zones: (1) lead-in; (2) dataarea; and (3) lead-out. These three areas are located on a continuousspiral path from the inner diameter to the outer diameter of the disc.The lead-in area contains information used by the logical unit todetermine media characteristics and manage the logical layout. Thelead-in is preferably formed partially with embossed pits as found onDVD-ROM media and partially written with the phase change effect.

The data area is divided into spare areas and user data areas accordingto the concepts of the present invention. The size of each is userconfigurable, allowing flexibility to accommodate both computer andstreamed (video) data. The allocation of the data area to user data andspare areas is done only at format time, although this allocation may bealtered again upon a subsequent format.

The defect management scheme of the present invention specifies a numberof spare sectors (spare length SL) per number of user data sectors(spare interval SI), where SL and SI are user chosen values as describedabove.

Preferably, SL and SI are integral powers of two, i.e., 2^(N), with avalue of 16 or higher. This constraint on selection of SL and SI allowsimplementations to use shifting, addition, and masking rather thandivision, multiplication, and modulo functions in order to yield agreater performance gain. For example, instead of multiplying a numberby 16 (2⁴), it can be shifted left 4 bits. Instead of dividing a numberby 32 (2⁵), it can be shifted right 5 bits. Instead of performing X mod(16), X can be logically bitwise ANDed with 0Fh. Finally, multiplying Xby 48 (16+32) can be performed by (X<<4)+(X<<5), where << representslogical shift left.

Additionally, SL and SI are preferably chosen such that the total defectlist size is less than or equal to 32,768 bytes (including the headers).However, any selection of values for SI and SL, i.e., arbitrary SI andSL, may be utilized according to the present invention, although theremay be a performance tradeoff experienced due to more complicatedalgorithms for converting a logical address to a physical address.

In the preferred embodiment, SI is restricted to values 2^(N), whereN≧4. However, SL is allowed to be zero in order to define no areas forsparing and is therefore restricted to values 0 or 2^(M), wherein M≧4.There is no explicit relationship of either SI or SL to the disc size.

It shall be appreciated that placing the spare area ahead of the userdata area, allows for some practical implementations where the 2^(N)restriction is implemented with SI and SL. When these values get large,they cannot be controlled finely. However, because the spare area issmaller than the user data area, the numbers are also more fine. Forexample, if a disc is desired with one spare area and one user dataarea, and that disc has 1.5 million sectors and if a spare area of about5% of the available sectors were desired, the user data area would needto be 1.425 million sectors. The closest allowed numbers areapproximately 1 million and approximately 2 million (i.e., 2²⁰ or 2²¹),thus preventing this layout. However, if the spare area is first, 65536sectors could be allocated followed by 2 million user data sectors.According to the present invention, it doesn't matter that the last ½million sectors do not exist. In fact, the user data area could be anynumber greater than 2 million. The figure is merely a parameter to theequation; if the output of the equation is a physical address largerthan what actually exists on the media, the request fails at that point.

DVD+RW media is directly addressable by a logical block address, i.e.,error correction code (ECC) blocks having 16 sectors each, and permitsreading and writing from any of the consecutively numbered logicalblocks. The actual data may not be stored in a consecutive manner, eventhough the logical blocks are consecutive, because of defect managementand the existence of physical sectors which do not directly correspondto logical blocks. This is illustrated in FIG. 4 where defective sectorsX and Y of the user area are replaced with sectors from a sparing area,such as may be established physically ahead of the area directlyavailable to the user.

As in DVD-ROM, logical block address (LBA) 0 preferably does not map tophysical block address (PBA) 0. Instead, the first data block is at PBA31000h. Additionally, it is preferred that no sparing occur in drivedata areas, but rather sparing occurs only within the user data area,which begins at physical sector number 3 1000h. DVD+RW preferably placesthe first defect management area at this first data block. Accordingly,if any sparing space is established at format, the first non-defectivebock at or after block 31000h is reserved for sparing.

Preferably, LBA 0 is assigned to the first non-defective block followingthe first spare area. The logical block addresses increase monotonicallyfrom this point to the outer diameter of the media, skipping each defectlisted in the active PDL as well as each of the areas set aside forsparing.

The sparing parameters, SI and SL, are contained in the defectmanagement area (DMA) which, for example, may consist of 128 sectorsreserved on the media for use as the defect management area. The DMAalso contains information with respect to the primary defect list, i.e.,slipping of physical addresses to logical addresses, and secondarydefect list, i.e., replacement of defective blocks with sparing blocks.Accordingly, in the preferred embodiment, the DMA contains an activePDL, a backup or duplicate PDL, an active SDL, including a list of areasavailable for sparing, and a backup or duplicate SDL. With respect tothe multiple copies of the PDL and SDL, the preferred embodiment readsall copies and uses the one with the highest sequence number. If thereare multiple copies with the same highest sequence number, any copy maybe used, with no stated preference.

Preferably, each defect management area includes 64 sectors, groupedinto 4 ECC blocks. Although, where 2K sectors are utilized, 32K is setaside each for the PDL and SDL, preferably (N_PDL*4+N_SDL*8≦32,744)shall be true. Where N_SDL and N_PDL are parameters in the SDL and PDL,respectively. N_SDL being the number of entries in the SDL. N_PDL beingthe number of entries in the PDL.

The contents of each of the ECC blocks is shown in the table below.

DMA ECC block layout Sector (block) Contents  0(0) PDL 16(1) SDL 32(2)PDL 48(3) SDLPreferably, all copies of the PDL are equivalent and all copies of theSDL are equivalent, i.e., active and inactive copies of the PDL and SDLare provided for fault tolerance.

As discussed above, the PDL contains a list of blocks determined to bedefective at format time. These blocks are “slipped” out of logicalspace by not assigning a logical address to slipped blocks. Preferably,the PDL consists of a header followed by a defect list, as shown in thetable below.

PDL area format BP Contents Length 0 PDL Identifier = (02A50) 2 2 Numberof PDL entries (N_PDL) 2 4 PDL Update Count 4 8 Spare Interval 4 12Spare Length 4 16 PDL entry 0 4 20 PDL entry 1 4 . . . . . . . . . N_PDL× 4 + 12 PDL entry N_PDL-1 4 N_PDL × 4 + 16 Reserved . . . to 32767 set60 (00)Where BP, as used in the first column in the table above, representsbyte position, which is the byte offset from the beginning of thestructure, i.e., the beginning of the PDL.

In order to identify a PDL recorded according to the invention describedherein, the PDL identifier will be a unique identification number orcode, such as (02A50) illustrated above.

The number of PDL entries indicates the number of entries in the PDL.The PDL update count specifies the total number of update operations forthe PDL area. This field should be set to zero (00000000) during thefirst format or certification operation, and thereafter incremented byone each time the PDL is re-written.

The spare interval (SI) field and spare length (SL) field store the userdefinable logical zone information of the present invention discussedabove. Accordingly, the spare interval field indicates the number ofphysical user data sectors between each set of blocks set aside forlinear replacement operations. Likewise, the spare length (SL) fieldindicates the number of physical sectors set aside for linearreplacement for each spare interval.

Preferably, each PDL entry is recorded as shown in the table below.

PDL Entry b₃₁ b₃₀ b₂₉ b₂₄ b₂₃ b₀ Defect Type Reserved Defective BlockNumberThe defective block number preferably contains the physical sectornumber of the first sector of the ECC block to be skipped when assigninglogical sector numbers. Entries are preferably sorted in ascending orderby the defective block number field in order to facilitate rapidsearching of the PDL.

A preferred embodiment of the defect type entries are set forth in thetable below.

PDL Entry Defect Type definition, b₃₁ and b₃₀ Defect Type Definition 00The entry was generated by the disc manufacturer. 01 The entry wasgenerated by the user manufacturer. 10 The entry was generated by theuser by means other than certification. 11 The entry was generated bythe disc manufacturer but is to be ignored when slipping.In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, defect types 00-10are sorted together by defective block number and defect type 11 issorted separately by defective block number and placed after all 00-10entries.

The SDL contains a list of blocks determined to be defective during theuse of the media. This determination may be made during either read orwrite operations, depending on user settings. The SDL preferablyconsists of a header followed by a defect list, as shown in the tablebelow.

SDL area format BP Contents Length 0 SDL Identifier = (2A53) 2 2 Numberof SDL entries (N_SDL) 2 4 SDL Update Count 4 8 SDL entry 0 8 16 SDLentry 1 8 . . . . . . . . . N_SDL × 8 SDL entry N_SDL-1 8 N_SDL × 8 + 8Reserved . . . to 32767 set to (00)All blocks set aside for sparing are preferably identified by an SDLentry, whether they are currently in use for sparing or not (with astatus field of unused blocks set to a value to indicate availabilityfor use in sparing). Additionally, in the preferred embodiment, thereare no hierarchical replacements of blocks, i.e., no replacement blocknumber may be listed in any defective block number field. Furthermore,no PBA is listed more than once across the PDL and SDL according to thepreferred embodiment of the present invention.

In order to identify a SDL recorded according to the invention describedherein, the SDL identifier will be a unique identification number orcode, such as (02A53) illustrated above. The number of SDL entriesindicates the number of entries in the SDL. The SDL update countspecifies the total number of update operations for the SDL area. Thisfield should be set to zero (00000000) during the first format orcertification operation, and thereafter incremented by one each time theSDL is rewritten.

Preferably, each SDL entry is formatted as shown in the table below.

SDL entry format b₆₃ b₆₂ b₆₁ b₅₆ b₅₅ b₃₂ b₃₁ b₂₄ b₂₃ b₀ Status ReservedDefective Block Reserved Replacement Block Number NumberThe defective block number identifies the physical sector address of thefirst sector of the block to be replaced. Similarly, the replacementblock number identifies the physical sector address of the first sectorof the block to hold the replaced block.

Preferably, the Status field indicates the status of the entry as shownin the table below.

SDL Entry Status definition, b₆₃ and b₆₂ Defect Type Definition 00 Theentry identifies a valid replacement. 01 The entry identifies adefective location on the medium that has not been recorded at its newaddress. Note: A block identified by a 01b, when reading is requested,reads the block from its old “defective” address, and when writing isrequested, the block is written to the replacement address and thestatus changed to 00b. 10 The replacement block number field identifiesan area usable for future replacement. The defective block number fieldis set to zero. 11 The replacement block number field identifies a sparelocation unusable for sparing, i.e., a defective sparing block. Thedefective block number field is set to zero.Accordingly, each of the blocks set aside for replacement but not in useor identified as defective will be identified by an SDL status entry 10.

Preferably, the SDL is sorted in ascending order according to its 64 bitentries; e.g. first sorted by status, in order to facilitate location ofused or available sparing blocks for example, and then by defectiveblock number, to facilitate locating a replacement block for aparticular logical block address for example, then by replacement blocknumber, to facilitate location of a nearest or next availablereplacement block for example.

A sequence for determining the PBA for a supplied LBA according to thepresent invention is as illustrated in FIG. 5 and as described asfollows:

Initially, according to the preferred embodiment of the presentinvention, a primary defect list is established, as described above,having information with respect to data areas initially determined to bedefective (step 500). Utilizing this information, the logical blockaddresses for the data areas of the media are slipped to omit thosedefective areas (step 510). The spare interval and spare lengthparameters are utilized to establish on the media the particular areasto be used as user data areas and their corresponding sparing areas(steps 520 and 530). Additionally, the SDL is established, andsubsequently maintained, to include each sparing block and its status(step 540). Having been adapted as above, a logical block address whichis to be read or written may be selected (step 550) and the physicalblock address determined by the following steps.${{Apply}\quad{the}\quad{formula}{\quad\quad}{PBA}_{1}} = {{\left( \frac{LBA}{SI} \right) \times \left( {{SI} + {SL}} \right)} + {{LBA}\quad{mod}\quad({SI})} + {3100h} + {SL}}$to the LBA to map around the areas set aside for defect management (step560). This formula provides an intermediary physical block addresstaking into account the placement of the sparing areas as defined by theparameters SI and SL. Additionally, this formula also takes into accountthe fact that the preferred embodiment provides for user areas startingat 31000h. Of course, this formula is provided herein as an example andis not intended to limit the present invention. For example, where theuser area begins at a point other than address 31000h, the formula wouldbe adjusted accordingly. It shall be appreciated that all math accordingto the formula above is integer arithmetic.

Upon determining the intermediary physical block address (PBA₁),adjusting for the sparing areas established according to the presentinvention, this physical block address must then be adjusted for anyslipping of addresses due to initial defects. Of course, where there areno initial defects, this second step is not necessary. Accordingly, adetermination is made as to whether any initial defects exist (step570). If not, the sequence proceeds to step 590. If there are initialdefects, the sequence proceeds to step 580.

To adjust the intermediary physical block address in order to accountfor slipped addresses, the following algorithm is preferably utilizedwith reference to the PDL (step 580):

-   -   Set PBA₂=PBA₁    -   Set Index =0    -   While (PBA₂≧PDL[Index])        -   Set PBA₂=PBA₂+16        -   Set Index=Index+1    -   End While        Accordingly, the primary defect list is searched to determine        the number of physical block addresses entered therein which are        disposed on the media prior to the intermediary physical block        address. The intermediary physical block address is increased        the slipping amount, in the preferred embodiment 16 sectors, for        each such physical block address appearing in the PDL. Of        course, this algorithm is provided herein as an example and is        not intended to limit the present invention. For example, where        the blocks utilized are other than 16 sectors, the algorithm        would be adjusted accordingly.

Furthermore, although a linear search is shown wherein a “destination”block address is slipped one block per entry found in the PDL, it shallbe appreciated that a binary search algorithm may be used. It shall beappreciated that a single search of the PDL is possible utilizing abinary search, as with the linear search above, if the Index*(blocksize) is added to the requested block before testing against the table.For example, blocks may be skipped by the index into the PDL where theentry is larger than the requested block and that index is added to therequested blocks.

Finally in determining the physical block address of a particularlogical block address according to this preferred embodiment of thepresent invention, an attempt is made to find the intermediary physicalblock address adjusted for slipping (PBA₂) in the SDL (step 590).Because of the “blocking,” no entries in the tables will have an addressin the middle of a block. Since PBA₂, as determined above, may be anyaddress, including the middle of a possibly relocated block, the addressis adjusted to find the beginning of the block that would include PBA₂.Since the block size is in this preferred embodiment is 16, this startaddress can be found by performing a logical AND of PBA₂ with 1FFFF0h,essentially setting the four least significant bits to zero. The bitsthen need to be restored after the lookup in the SDL and, accordingly,PBA₂ is ANDed with 0Fh and added back to the replacement block address.The offset into the replacement block is the same as the offset into theoriginal block. Accordingly, the PBA is preferably computed as shownbelow.

SDL Interpretation Status Translation 00 PBA = PBA_(REPLACEMENT) + (PBA₂& (0F)) 01, reading PBA = PBA₂ 01, writing PBA = PBA_(REPLACEMENT) +(PBA₂ & 0F)) 10 PBA = PBA₂ 11 PBA = PBA₂

The sequence above indicates that the space set aside for sparing isslipped according to the PDL. However, entries in the SDL preferablyindicate the actual physical address and therefore are not be adjustedby the PDL. This results in the replacement block numbers in the SDLpossibly not having SI contiguous blocks every (SI+SL) interval.

Although the present invention and its advantages have been described indetail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions andalterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit andscope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

1. A method for providing media defect management, said methodcomprising the steps of: defining a user data area on the media bychoosing a value for a user area parameter; defining a user datareplacement area on the media by choosing a value for a replacement areaparameter, wherein the user data replacement area on the media definedby the value of the replacement area parameter may be null; and whereinthe values chosen for the user area parameter and replacement areaparameter determine a particular distributed sparing configuration andthereby defining appropriate defect management.
 2. The method of claim1, further comprising the step of: maintaining a defect list includinginformation identifying each independently accessible section of userdata replacement area on the media.
 3. The method of claim 2, whereinthe step of maintaining the defect list includes the step of:categorizing the independently accessible sections of the user datareplacement area in the defect list to provide information with respectto their use in replacing sections of user data areas of the media. 4.The method of claim 3, wherein the information provided by thecategorizing step includes information with respect to a defectivesection of the user data area that has not been recorded within asection of the user data replacement area.
 5. The method of claim 3,wherein the information provided by the categorizing step preventschaining of a section of the user data area to multiple sections of theuser data replacement area when a section of the user data replacementarea becomes defective.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the valuesselected for the user area parameter and the replacement area parametercombined define a logical zone such that, if the values selected for theuser area parameter and the replacement area parameter are sufficientlysmall with respect to a total size of the media, a plurality of equal insize zones of user data area and user data replacement area are definedon the media.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein a physical address of aparticular section of the user data area adjusted for the existence ofthe logical zone from a logical address used to logically identify theparticular section of the user data area may be determined through theresult of the mathematical expression:integer (logical address/user area parameter)×(user areaparameter+replacement area parameter)+modulo(logical address/user areaparameter)+(offset of user data area).
 8. The method of claim 1, whereinchoosing a value for the user area parameter and choosing a value forthe replacement area parameter is selected from the group ofrelationships consisting of: a sum of the values of the user areaparameter and the replacement area parameter is approximately a size ofthe media; a sum of twice the value of the user area parameter and thevalue of the replacement area parameter is approximately a size of themedia; a sum of the values of the user area parameter and thereplacement area parameter is approximately ½ a size of the media; a sumof the values of the user area parameter and the replacement areaparameter is selected to be small with respect to a size of the media;and a sum of the values of the user area parameter and the replacementarea parameter is approximately the size of an underlying physical zone.9. The method of claim 1, wherein the user data replacement areaassociated with the value of the replacement area parameter is disposedon the media at an address prior to a corresponding user data areaassociated with the value of the user area parameter.
 10. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the user data replacement area associated with thevalue of the replacement area parameter is disposed on the media at anaddress subsequent to a corresponding user data area associated with thevalue of the user area parameter.
 11. The method of claim 9, wherein asum of the values of the user area parameter and the replacement areaparameter is selected to be greater than a size of the media toaccommodate selection of a desired value of the replacement areaparameter.
 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:establishing a logical address hierarchy providing logical addressingfor physical addresses of sections of the user data area and sections ofthe user data replacement area, wherein the logical address hierarchyomits physical addresses of sections of data areas determined to bedefective, and wherein omission of physical addresses of sections ofdata areas determined to be defective affects logical addresses of allsubsequent sections of data areas on the media.
 13. The method of claim12, wherein the step of establishing a logical address hierarchycomprises the step of: generating a defect list including informationidentifying the sections of the data areas determined to be defectiveand omitted from the logical address hierarchy.
 14. The method of claim12, wherein adjustment of the logical addressing for a particularphysical address to omit physical addresses of sections of data areasdetermined to be defective is accomplished in units equivalent to asingle user data area section.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein thesteps of choosing a value for the user area parameter and replacementarea parameter is performed independent of data segment boundaries onthe media arising from geometric characteristics of the media.
 16. Asystem for providing media defect management, said system comprising: auser area parameter having a value selected to define a user data areaon the media; and a replacement area parameter having a value selectedto define a user data replacement data area on the media, wherein theuser data replacement area on the media defined by the value selectedfor the replacement area parameter may be null; and wherein the valuesselected for the user area parameter and replacement area parameterdetermine appropriate defect management for a particular use of themedia.
 17. The system of claim 16, further comprising: means formaintaining a defect list including information identifying eachindependently accessible section of user replacement data area on themedia.
 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the defect list maintainingmeans includes: means for categorizing the independently accessiblesections of the user data replacement areas in the defect list toprovide information with respect to their use in replacing user dataareas of the media.
 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the categorizingmeans includes: means for providing information with respect to adefective section of the user data area that has not been recordedwithin a section of the user data replacement area.
 20. The system ofclaim 16, wherein the values selected for the user area parameter andthe replacement area parameter combined define a logical zone such that,if the values selected for the user area parameter and the replacementarea parameter are sufficiently small with respect to a total size ofthe media, a plurality of equal in size zones of user data area and userdata replacement area are defined on the media.
 21. The system of claim16, wherein the values of the user area parameter and the replacementarea parameter are selectable from the group of relationships consistingof: a sum of the values of the user area parameter and the replacementarea parameter is approximately a size of the media; a sum of twice thevalue of the user area parameter and the value of the replacement areaparameter is approximately a size of the media; a sum of the values ofthe user area parameter and the replacement area parameter isapproximately ½ a size of the media; a sum of the values of the userarea parameter and the replacement area parameter is selected to besmall with respect to a size of the media; and a sum of the values ofthe user area parameter and the replacement area parameter isapproximately the size of an underlying physical zone.
 22. The system ofclaim 16, wherein the user data replacement area associated with thevalue of the replacement area parameter is disposed on the media priorto the user data area associated with the value of the user areaparameter.
 23. The system of claim 16, wherein the user data replacementarea associated with the value of the replacement area parameter isdisposed on the media subsequent to the user data area associated withthe value of the user area parameter.
 24. The system of claim 22,wherein a sum of the values of the user area parameter and thereplacement area parameter is selected to be greater than a size of themedia to accommodate selection of a desired value of the replacementarea parameter.
 25. The system of claim 16, further comprising: meansfor establishing a logical address hierarchy providing logicaladdressing for physical addresses of data areas on the media for use asthe user data area associated with the user area parameter and the userdata replacement data area associated with the replacement areaparameter, wherein the logical address hierarchy omits physicaladdresses of data areas determined to be defective, and wherein omissionof physical addresses of data areas determined to be defective affectslogical addresses of all subsequent data areas on the media.
 26. Thesystem of claim 16, wherein the distributed sparing configuration isdetermined irrespective of a geometric arrangement of data storageelements due to a physical structure of the media.
 27. A method forproviding media defect management for a block addressable bulk storagemedia, said method comprising the steps of: establishing a number ofblocks of a user data area on the media by choosing a value for a spareinterval parameter; establishing a number of blocks of a user datasparing area on the media by choosing a value for a spare lengthparameter, wherein the number of blocks of a user data sparing areaestablished by the value of the spare length parameter may be zero;wherein the chosen values for the spare interval parameter and sparelength parameter determine a particular distributed sparingconfiguration irrespective of physical zones of the media; andmaintaining a list including information identifying each block of theuser data sparing area, wherein the list includes information withrespect to a status of each block identified.
 28. The method of claim27, wherein the information with respect to a status of each blockincludes information with respect to a defective block of the user dataarea that has not been recorded within a block of the user datareplacement area.
 29. The method of claim 28, further comprising thestep of: establishing a logical address hierarchy of the blocks of themedia wherein physical addresses of blocks initially determined to bedefective are not included in the logical address hierarchy, and whereinall logical addresses corresponding to a physical address subsequent toa block initially determined to be defective are adjusted at least anaddress space of the block initially determined to be defective.
 30. Themethod of claim 27, wherein the steps of choosing a value for the spareinterval parameter and the spare length parameter define appropriatedefect management for a particular use of the media.